Venue: The Jeffrey Room - The Guildhall, Northampton, NN1 1DE. View directions
Contact: Ed Bostock, Democratic Services
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence and Appointment of Substitute Members Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Dyball, Russell, Smith, and Choudary. |
|
Declarations of Interest Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting. Minutes: None advised. |
|
Minutes To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee held on 6th September 2022. Minutes: The minutes would be brought to the next meeting. |
|
Chair's Announcements To receive communications from the Chair. Minutes: The Chair advised that items 8b and 8c had been withdrawn prior to the meeting. |
|
Deputations/Public Addresses Minutes: RESOLVED:
That under the following items, the members of the public and Ward Councillors listed below were granted leave to address the Committee:
WNN/2021/0927 John Roberts
WNN/2022/0713 Councillor Purser |
|
List of Current Appeals/Inquiries PDF 150 KB Minutes: The Development Management Team Leader advised of no decisions reached by the Inspector but asked Members to contact the Planning department with any specific queries. |
|
Minutes: The Development Management Team Leader presented the report which asked the Committee to approve the making of an Order under Section 14(1) of the Planning (Hazardous Substance) Act 1990 to revoke the Hazardous Substance Consent (HSC) at the site of MFI Group (also known as Howdens), Lilliput Road, Brackmills, Northampton. Revocation would be subject to confirmation by the Secretary of State. It was noted that the building had been demolished and storage tanks associated with the Hazardous Substance Consent had been absent from the site for more than 5 years. Planning approval had been granted for redevelopment of the site for a distribution warehouse units and works were nearly complete; a condition was included to secure the removal of the Hazardous Substance Consent.
Members discussed the report.
RESOLVED:
That the Order be AUTHORISED under Section 14(1) of the Planning (Hazardous Substance) Act 1990 seeking revocation of the Hazardous Substance Consent (HSC) at the site of MFI Group (also known as Howdens), Lilliput Road, Brackmills, Northampton, to be confirmed by the Secretary of State. |
|
Minutes: The Principal Planning Officer presented the report which sought approval of reserved matters for the erection of 104 dwellings pursuant to outline planning permission N/2016/0810. Members attention was drawn to the Addendum. The reserved matters comprise the layout, scale, appearance and the landscaping of the development site. 55 of the proposed units were new build and the remaining units would be created from the conversion of existing buildings. Access was previously approved. The development would comprise 100% affordable housing, TPO protected trees to the west of the site would be retained and 2 play areas would be created. The application had been subject to extensive consultation.
John Roberts, the architect on behalf of the applicant, addressed the Committee and spoke in favour of the application. He commented that there were no technical objections to the application and that retaining the Bassett-Lowke building was more sustainable than it would be to demolish it and rebuild. EV charging points would be provided, national minimum space standards would be met throughout the development, and it would contribute to the Council’s 5-year housing supply.
In response to questions, Mr Roberts advised that each house would have 2 parking spaces and a communal car park was provided for the flats. It was hoped that construction would begin by June 2023.
Members discussed the report and made the following comments: · They thanked Mr Roberts for his statement · The proposed development was well set out and would be a pleasant environment in which to live.
Councillor Clark proposed and Councillor Beardsworth seconded that the officer recommendation be approved. The recommendation contained within the report were put to a vote and was unanimously declared carried.
RESOLVED:
That the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions and reasons as set out in the report and as amended in the Addendum. |
|
Minutes: This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting. |
|
Minutes: This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting. |
|
Minutes: The Senior Planning Officer presented the report which sought approval for a ground floor single-storey rear extension to enlarge the toilet area, first floor rear extension to create a larger dining area with a balcony and amendment to existing rear fire escape stair and side access gates. A condition was included to restrict the hours of use of the balcony, and an obscure glazed screen to the edge of the balcony reduce overlooking. A further condition was included which required details of a noise management plan to be submitted to the Council. Concern had been raised by local residents regarding existing and potential noise, but it was noted that the existing use of the public house was not a matter for consideration by the Committee.
Councillor Purser, in his capacity as a Ward Member for the area, addressed the Committee and spoke against the application. He commented that residents had concern around the noise generated on the balcony at night and that the area suffered with antisocial behaviour and waste issues that could be attributed to the pub.
In response to questions, the Committee heard that existing noise issues were outside of the remit of Planning; noise complaints were dealt with by Licensing, and an additional condition could be included to require the re-arrangement of the pub’s bins. It was noted that there were no objections from Environmental Health, subject to conditions. It was confirmed that there had been no noise complaints relating to the pub in the last 5 years.
Members discussed the report and made the following comments: · Members hoped that Licensing were able to deal with any issues relating to the pub that were brought to their attention. · Members would like to see an additional condition relating to waste included.
Councillor Lane proposed and Councillor Connolly seconded that the officer recommendation be approved, with an additional condition in respect of refuse storage details. The recommendation and additional condition were put to a vote and declared carried with 4 votes for and 1 vote against.
RESOLVED:
That the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions and reasons as set out in the report with additional condition in respect of refuse storage details. |
|
WNN/2022/0713 - 11no apartments and associated refuse and cycle storage. 31 Abington Square PDF 1 MB Minutes: The Principal Planning Officer presented the report which sought approval for a change of use of the existing first floor level of 31 Abington Square to 11 apartments. Access into the residential accommodation would be made from a new access from the rear of the building. The proposal would not provide any vehicle parking; however, the site was in a sustainable location close to shopping facilities and public transport links. Ground floor cycle storage and residential refuse storage was proposed as part of the application. There were no statutory objections to the application.
In response to questions, it was explained that there was no policy base to require contributions towards libraries. It was also explained that there were 2 conditions included which related to noise.
Members discussed the report and made the following comments: · Members were happy that a disused building would be brough back into use.
Councillor Cali proposed and Councillor Connolly seconded that the officer recommendation be approved. The recommendation contained within the report were put to a vote and was unanimously declared carried.
RESOLVED:
That the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions and reasons as set out in the report. |
|
Urgent Business The Chair to advise whether they have agreed to any items of urgent business being admitted to the agenda. Minutes: None advised. |